GMAB GENMAB A/S
Executive Summary
An institutional cluster in GMAB shows mixed conviction: two passive funds (Fidelity, Schwab) added $21.8M in new holdings, while four institutions (including Citadel and three passive managers) reduced positions by $85.7M. The net selling pressure of ~$63.9M from the sellers, led by Citadel's near-exit of a $73.7M position, dominates the cluster signal and suggests caution despite the buying activity.
Key Financial Metrics
Institutional Positions
Net institutional flow: -$63.9M
▲ Buyers (2)
| Institution | Action | Change | Position Value | Value Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelity | ADD | +64.5% | $34.3M | $20.3M |
| Schwab | ADD | +32.3% | $3.1M | $1.5M |
▼ Sellers (4)
| Institution | Action | Change | Prev Value | Value Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel | NEAR_EXIT | -98.6% | $73.7M | -$72.2M |
| UBS | NEAR_EXIT | -83.1% | $10.0M | -$7.5M |
| Morgan Stanley | TRIM | -37.9% | $55.7M | -$4.4M |
| BofA | TRIM | -42.2% | $11.7M | -$1.7M |
Actionable Insight
The cluster is dominated by passive fund rebalancing on both sides, but Citadel's near-total exit of a large position is a notable active-manager signal. Monitor for any fundamental deterioration or catalyst that could explain the selling. The buying from Fidelity and Schwab is likely mechanical and does not offset the bearish signal from the sellers.
Key Facts
- 2 buyers added $21.8M in new holdings (Fidelity +$20.3M, Schwab +$1.5M)
- 4 sellers reduced positions by $85.7M (Citadel -$72.2M, UBS -$7.5M, Morgan Stanley -$4.4M, BofA -$1.7M)
- Citadel executed a near-exit, reducing a $73.7M position to $1.6M (-98.6% of shares)
- All buyers are mega-passive funds (likely index rebalancing), while sellers include one active quant (Citadel) and three passive managers
- Net aggregate change: -$63.9M (sellers outweigh buyers by ~3:1 in dollar terms)
Financial Impact
Net institutional selling of ~$63.9M in Q3 2025, with total seller reductions of $85.7M versus buyer additions of $21.8M
Risk Factors
- 13F data is 45+ days stale; positions may have been further adjusted since quarter-end
- Passive fund activity may reflect index rebalancing rather than fundamental conviction
- Historical reports on GMAB show negative T+20 performance (-12.88% on prior bullish call), suggesting the stock has been difficult to time
Market Snapshot
Documents Analyzed
This report is based on 1 institutional 13F filing from SEC EDGAR.
| Document | Accession Number |
|---|---|
| INST-CLUSTER Data (Synthetic) | inst-cluster-GMAB-2025-Q3 |
Track record builds as more directional reports settle.
Filters
| Type | Now | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Jun 11, 2026
3d ago
|
6-K
| $25.21 awaiting T+60 | awaiting T+60 | — | — |
|
Jun 11, 2026
3d ago
|
Institutional Cluster
| $24.48 awaiting T+60 | awaiting T+60 | — | — |
|
Feb 28, 2026
15w ago
|
Institutional Cluster
| $29.65 $26.89 | ▼ −9.31% | ▼ −18.64% | — |
US Market Status
Subscribe to SecBot
Get Real-Time SEC Filing Intelligence
Comprehensive SEC filing analysis delivered the moment filings hit EDGAR. Sentiment scoring, impact analysis, and actionable insights for every material event.
Try SecBot Free Coming soon: SecBot Pro with alerts, watchlists, and API access