CHYM Chime Financial, Inc.
Executive Summary
In Q4 2025, a mixed institutional cluster formed in Chime Financial (CHYM) with two passive mega-managers (State Street, Morgan Stanley) adding $10.5M in combined positions while three other passive mega-managers (Vanguard, BlackRock, Fidelity) trimmed $7.8M. The net buying of $2.7M is modest relative to the $6.3B market cap, and all activity comes from passive/index funds, not active managers, weakening the signal. Historical performance on CHYM reports has been poor (0% win rate at T+20, average -22.55% return), and the calibration data shows low observed win rates for scores 6-8, suggesting limited predictive value from this cluster.
Key Financial Metrics
Institutional Positions
Net institutional flow: $2.7M
▲ Buyers (2)
| Institution | Action | Change | Position Value | Value Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State Street | ADD | +41.7% | $5.7M | $2.5M |
| Morgan Stanley | ADD | +99.9% | $13.4M | $8.0M |
▼ Sellers (3)
| Institution | Action | Change | Prev Value | Value Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | TRIM | -28% | $15.8M | -$1.6M |
| BlackRock | TRIM | -29.9% | $45.4M | -$5.7M |
| Fidelity | TRIM | -31.2% | $3.4M | -$485.8K |
Actionable Insight
The cluster is dominated entirely by passive/index rebalancing, not active conviction. With zero active manager participation and poor historical report performance on CHYM, this filing provides no actionable directional signal. Monitor for any active manager 13F filings or insider buying for a stronger read.
Key Facts
- 2 passive mega-managers added $10.5M in CHYM positions in Q4 2025
- 3 passive mega-managers trimmed $7.8M in CHYM positions in Q4 2025
- Net institutional flow was +$2.7M, or ~0.04% of market cap
- All 5 institutions are passive/index fund managers — zero active manager involvement
- Morgan Stanley nearly doubled its position (+99.9% shares), adding $8.0M
- BlackRock was the largest seller, trimming $5.7M (-29.9% of its position)
- Prior CHYM reports have 0% win rate at T+20 with average -22.55% return
Financial Impact
Net institutional buying of $2.7M across 5 passive funds, representing ~0.04% of CHYM's $6.3B market cap
Risk Factors
- 13F data is 45+ days stale — positions may have been unwound
- All activity is passive rebalancing, not active thesis-driven trading
- Historical CHYM reports have 0% win rate at T+20 with severe negative returns
- Calibration data shows low predictive accuracy for scores 6-8 in this segment
Market Snapshot
Documents Analyzed
This report is based on 1 institutional 13F filing from SEC EDGAR.
| Document | Accession Number |
|---|---|
| INST-CLUSTER Data (Synthetic) | inst-cluster-CHYM-2025-Q4 |
Track record builds as more directional reports settle.
Filters
| Type | Now | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Jun 11, 2026
3d ago
|
Institutional Cluster
| $16.43 awaiting T+20 | awaiting T+20 | — | — |
|
Jun 11, 2026
3d ago
|
Institutional Cluster
| $16.43 awaiting T+20 | awaiting T+20 | — | — |
|
Apr 17, 2026
8w ago
|
DEFA14A
| $24.37 $17.55 | ▼ −27.99% | ▼ −32.19% | — |
|
Feb 25, 2026
15w ago
|
8-K
| $21.11 $17.70 | ▼ −16.15% | ▼ −10.92% | — |
US Market Status
Subscribe to SecBot
Get Real-Time SEC Filing Intelligence
Comprehensive SEC filing analysis delivered the moment filings hit EDGAR. Sentiment scoring, impact analysis, and actionable insights for every material event.
Try SecBot Free Coming soon: SecBot Pro with alerts, watchlists, and API access